Marks: PB top line and MPA bottom line with differences highlighted in red

Student	Answer 1	Answer 2	Answer 3	Answer 4	Answer 5	Answer 6
Nicki Alison Agron-Olshina	14 13	1 1	4 4	3 3	3 3	10 10
Lars-Erik Briggner	13 13	1 1	4 4	3 3	3 3	8 8
Josef Bursik	13 13	3 3	4 4	3 3	2.5 2.5	9.5 7
Christy De Meyer	13 13	3 3	4 4	3 3	3 3	10 9
Fraser Rowan	15.5 16	1 1	4 4	3 3	3 3	8.5 8
Zhanhui Yuan	14 14	1 1	4 4	3 3	3 3	7 7

ACTION

After discussions with MPA, the following action was taken by JKC.

1. Agron-Olshina. Q1 reduce to 13 to be consistent with others.
2. Briggner. No change.
3. Bursik. Q6 reduced to 8.5 (in between MPA and PB). This answer illustrated some of the problems regarding the open-ended nature of Q6.
4. DeMeyer. Q6 reduced to 9 as little attempt to order reasons.
5. Rowan. No change to PB's marks since total mark was the same as for MPA.
6. Yuan. No change. I have add additional comment re "cutting & pasting" course material.

Student marked work adjusted accordingly (with revised comments where appropriate).
[DONE by JKC 02/5/02]

It was already suggested by MPA previously (see 2000/1) that this assignment could be improved. MPA has now produced an alternative: maybe the external examiner could comment on this one at the examiners' meeting since PB still keen on original question.
[DONE by MPA 26/4/02]
(See suggestions for new Assignment 3)

Back