Discussion of Marks for Assignment 6 between JKC & MPA on 2 August 2002

Comment: Lars-Erik Briggner had not submitted at this point, having requested and been given an extension.

Marks: JKC top line and MPA bottom line with differences highlighted in red

Student Answer 1 Answer 2 Answer 3 Answer 4 Answer 5
Nicki Alison Agron-Olshina 4
4		 3
3		 5
5		 2
2		 5
5
Lars-Erik Briggner 4
4		 4
4		 4
4		 3
3		 6
6
Josef Bursik 4
3		 4
4		 2
4		 0
0		 8
7
Christy De Meyer 4
4		 4
4		 8
8		 4
4		 7
7
Fraser Rowan 4
4		 3
4		 7
7		 2
2		 5
5
Zhanhui Yuan 4
3		 4
4		 0
0		 1
1		 4
4

ACTION

After discussions with MPA, the following action was taken by JKC.

  1. Agron-Olshina. No action required.
  2. Briggner. No action required.
  3. Bursik. For Q1, JKC marks stand as table had been included, but in different format to that expected by MPA. For Q3, MPA marks accepted for (a), and JKC for part (b) giving total of 3. For Q5, JKC marks stand.
  4. DeMeyer. No action required.
  5. Rowan. For Q2, JKC marks stand.
  6. Yuan. Despite slight reservations, it was agreed that the better marks could stand.

Student marked work adjusted accordingly (with revised comments where appropriate).

Back