Marks: JKC top line and MPA bottom line with differences highlighted in red

Student	Answer 1	Answer 2	Answer 3	Answer 4	Answer 5
Nicki Alison Agron-Olshina	5 5	5 4.5	4 4	4 4.5	7 7
Lars-Erik Briggner	5 5	5 4.5	4 4	5 4	9 10
Josef Bursik	5 5	5 5	3 2	5 5	7 8
Christy De Meyer	3 3	2 4	4 3	3 3	8 8.5
Zhanhui Yuan	3 3	3 3	5 5	4 3	5 5

ACTION

After discussions with MPA, the following action was taken by JKC.

1. Agron-Olshina. No change - since overall mark unchanged
2. Briggner. Q2. English error accepted so leave as 5. Q4 leave as 5 marks. Q5. JKC's comments and marks here to stand.
3. Bursik. No change - since overall mark unchanged
4. DeMeyer. Q2 leave as 2 since incorrect answer. Q3 leave as 4 since only range missing. Q5 leave as 8 so as to be consistent with other students' marks.
5. Yuan. Q4 leave as 4

Student marked work adjusted accordingly (with revised comments where appropriate).
[DONE by JKC 18/3/02]

A suggestion was made (and accepted) that wording for question 1 should request that workings being shown for the calculation. Question 5 was also discussed at some length. In particular, the wording should ask for the location of the symmetry element (when appropriate) and that 2 marks could be allocated per symmetry element with 1 mark for the symmetry element and 1 mark for the location/reason.
[DONE by JKC 18/3/02]

Back