Results: Tables of Geometric Parameters |
Results: Tables of Geometric Parameters
In addition to tables of instrument parameters, fractional atomic coordinates and temperature factors, it is important to provide tables of the geometric parameters that are derived from the final refined atomic coordinates of the structure. Most commonly, these tables contain calculated bond lengths and bond angles. Typically, two versions of these tables are produced; a list of selected parameters only is published, but a fuller listing is provided for refereeing and deposition.
The tables should include the value and esd for each parameter included, unless the parameter has been constrained during refinement, as would be typical for a C-H bond, say. The selection of parameters for the shorter, published table depends on the chemical nature of the compound and the structural features which need to be emphasised. For example, in a coordination compound you might only want to include bonds involving a central metal atom and the angles subtended at it, or for an organic molecule it might only be worth publishing a selected list of torsion angles, since the bond lengths and angles in organic molecules have been characterised in numerous studies. Non-bonding distances and short contacts, such as hydrogen bonds may be included; again this depends on the particular structural points under discussion.
Examples of table styles for the bond lengths and angles in an AlO6 octahedra are given below. Note how the bond lengths are repeated (two for O(1), O(2) and O(3)) so as to provide the reader with an understanding of how the full coordination sphere of the AlO6 unit is built up.
Al(1)-O(1) | 1.923(2) | Al(1)-O(1a) | 1.923(2) |
Al(1)-O(2b) | 1.886(3) | Al(1)-O(2c) | 1.886(3) |
Al(1)-O(3) | 1.895(2) | Al(1)-O(3a) | 1.895(2) |
O(1a)-Al(1)-O(1) |
180 |
O(1)-Al(1)-O(2b) |
88.33(12) |
O(1)-Al(1)-O(2c) | 91.67(12) | O(1a)-Al(1)-O(2b) | 89.55(14) |
O(1a)-Al(1)-O(2c) | 88.33(12) | O(1)-Al(1)-O(3) | 90.45(14) |
O(1)-Al(1)-O(3a) | 89.55(14) | O(1a)-Al(1)-O(3) | 89.55(14) |
O(1a)-Al(1)-O(3b) | 90.45(14) | O(2b)-Al(1)-O(2c) | 180 |
O(2b)-Al(1)-O(3) | 89.86(14) | O(2b)-Al(1)-O(3a) | 93.14(14) |
O(2c)-Al(1)-O(3) | 93.14(14) | O(2c)-Al(1)-O(3a) | 93.14(14) |
O(3)-Al(1)-O(3a) | 180 |
Interpretation
Both the values and the esd's of the geometrical parameters should be
examined, just as with the primary structure parameters.
See if the values presented are consistent with those found in other
structures with similar features. For example, compare the Al-O bond lengths
given in the above table to those found for other AlO6 octahedra which are
generally found in the range 1.85 - 2.00 Å. If any reported values fall
outside of the expected ranges look for an explanation of this in the
discussion of the structure. If short contact distances occur, for example, if
the oxygen atoms of two water molecules are 0.5 Å apart, then this clearly is
not physically reasonable unless the total occupancy of the two sites is less
than or equal to 50 %, and so the atomic occupancies of the atoms involved in
the short contact should be carefully scrutinised in the table of atomic
parameters and reference to the short contact distance should be sort in the
discussion section of the article.
If any geometrical parameters are given without esd's then it is assumed
that at least one of the atoms involved has not been refined freely. This
should be stated in the experimental section of the article. If
any geometrical parameters are constrained or restrained then they might have
an associated esd. However, the value of the geometrical parameter, as it is
not freely refined, should not be referred to as an absolute value in other
work and should only be compared "loosely" to other similar values.
© Copyright 1997-2006. Birkbeck College, University of London. | Author(s): Martin Attfield |