Logo Insertion Devices

Course Material Index  Section Index  Previous Page  Next Page 

Insertion Devices

Although a detailed account of synchrotron radiation devices is outside the remit of this course, a brief description of other magnet configurations is necessary.

When we considered the layout of a storage ring, we saw as many straight sections as dipole magnet sections. If we were to have a magnet system that accepted and returned electrons in the same direction then they could be inserted into these straight sections without affecting the operation of the dipole magnets, thereby doubling the number of potential X-ray magnet sources. Such systems are referred to as insertion devices of which wigglers and undulators are two basic kinds.

A. Wigglers

The radiation emitted by a dipole magnet (illustrated on the previous page) is characterised by the parameter λc, the critical wavelength by which the total power spectrum reaches 50%. A standard formula relates λc to the electron beam energy E (in GeV) and the bending magnetic field B (in Tesla):

λc    =  18.6
———
E2B

Therefore if for a given energy E we can increase B, and hence the radial acceleration, we would shift λc to a shorter wavelength thus the X-rays would on average have shorter, more penetrating, wavelengths. Such a device is therefore often referred to as a wavelength shifter. A so-called wiggler is both an insertion device and a wavelength shifter. A basic version is depicted below:

In its simplest form, the wiggler contains three magnets; the outer two magnets are opposed (magnetic field in opposite direction) to the central magnet. Basically the first (outer) magnet bends the electron path in the "wrong direction" (i.e. opposite curvature from the overall synchrotron ring), the second (middle) magnet over-compensates for this, and the third (outer) magnet brings the electron path back to its original direction (the overall motion could be described as a wiggle, hence the name). The over-compensation in the middle section is brought about by a very intense magnet (usually a super-conducting magnet with typically a 5-6 Tesla magnetic field strength) and the resulting tighter local curvature means that a greater radial acceleration is brought about with the consequent production of harder X-rays (i.e. higher energy photons). This is illustrated below where we can see that the wiggler spectrum resembles the dipole spectrum but shifted (by several tenths of an Ångstrom) towards shorter wavelengths. As the scale is logarithmic, this is more significant than is immediately apparent from the diagram.
For long wavelengths there is little difference in the two performances, but if the region of interest is in the extreme left side of the spectrum (typically around 0.4 Å) the intensity from the wiggler could be orders of magnitude more than from the dipole magnet. Clearly wiggler magnets are very important for short wavelength powder diffraction experiments.

B. Undulators

It consists of many (typically 20-30) alternating low field magnetic poles. This therefore produces an alternating series of inward and outward electron accelerations (such motion being described as undulations) each with its individual radiation emission from each pole. At some point downstream from the undulator these radiation emissions will overlap and interfere with each other, sometimes constructively and sometimes destructively. Depending on the exact configuration of the undulator, the resulting power spectrum as shown below can look very "lumpy" by comparison to the smooth dipole or wiggler spectra.

By choosing the magnet parameters and interference point carefully, the undulator spectrum can be designed so that one of the larger positive bumps corresponds with a wavelength region of interest. This is not the same action as a monochromator (see later) but what one is effectively doing is improving intensity of part of the spectrum at the expense of other parts. Undulator magnets have turned out to be popular insertion devices for the large third generation super-sychrotrons where their space requirement (excessive length due to the many poles) is less of a problem.


Course Material Index  Section Index  Previous Page  Next Page 
© Copyright 1997-2006.  Birkbeck College, University of London.
 
 
Author(s): Paul Barnes
Simon Jacques
Martin Vickers