Category	Mark	Comments
Overall	10	Simple structure, but beautifully laid out with clear section headings, tables, figures, and pictures. A pleasure to read.
HTML	8.5	Excellent, except for the use of 8 bit characters: probably put in by the Microsoft HTML editor used.
Results A	9.5	Correct values. Possibly a little more reasoning on temperature factor treatment could be given.
Results B	18.5	Correct values, but origin has been shifted by 1/2c for one of the monoclinic refinements making comparison with the RT structure less clear.
Tables	14	Esd missing on overall B value. Esd's missing on UVW values, which are quoted too precisely.
Figures	14.5	Excellent, but too many count labels up y axis
CIF	8	A couple of errors such as radiation type and Z value, which may be due to the software used.
Finale	8	Very good, but hasn't fully appreciated why the use of a limited range data set gives the wrong space group, but gives a good fit in terms of molecular packing.