Answer to Problem Set 4
Question: A collection of ancient plaster figures has been uncovered. A small sample is taken: microscopic examination identifies calcite (CaCO3) and electron microprobe analysis reveals Ca, Si and Mg as the major heavier elements. A powder diffraction pattern is collected, which after initial data analysis, yields the parameters below (the third parameter "FWHM" is a measure of the peak width).
Identify the two remaining phases in the sample. Explain, step by step, how you arrived at this solution. Comment on the solution.
| d (Å) | I (%) | FWHM(°) | d (Å) | I (%) | FWHM(°) | d (Å) | I (%) | FWHM(°) | ||||
| 4.27 | 28 | 0.27 | 2.237 | 4 | 0.23 | 1.700 | 5 | 0.35 | ||||
| 3.86 | 12 | 0.30 | 2.128 | 8 | 0.23 | 1.672 | 6 | 0.23 | ||||
| 3.343 | 82 | 0.25 | 2.102 | 6 | 0.35 | 1.659 | 2 | 0.24 | ||||
| 3.035 | 100 | 0.28 | 2.095 | 18 | 0.27 | 1.626 | 4 | 0.29 | ||||
| 2.845 | 3 | 0.28 | 1.980 | 4 | 0.23 | 1.604 | 8 | 0.28 | ||||
| 2.742 | 12 | 0.35 | 1.939 | 2 | 0.37 | 1.587 | 2 | 0.29 | ||||
| 2.503 | 2 | 0.36 | 1.927 | 5 | 0.29 | 1.541 | 12 | 0.23 | ||||
| 2.495 | 15 | 0.28 | 1.913 | 17 | 0.28 | 1.525 | 5 | 0.28 | ||||
| 2.458 | 10 | 0.22 | 1.875 | 17 | 0.28 | 1.518 | 4 | 0.30 | ||||
| 2.284 | 29 | 0.43 | 1.817 | 15 | 0.22 | 1.510 | 4 | 0.42 |
Even if you do not have the ICCD-PDF you will be able to work through the problem by using the files below (selected from the ICDD-PDF). You are advised to work through the problem in the following sequence:
| Page: | 13 (77 kBytes) |
| 14 (78 kBytes) | |
| 15 (79 kBytes) | |
| 16 (86 kBytes) |
| Page: | 30 (81 kBytes) |
| 31 (32 kBytes) | |
| 32 (29 kBytes) | |
| 33 (81 kBytes) |
You might find the following clues helpful:
The sample consists of the next three phases:
The first step was to notice in the list above entires which belong to calcite,
looking at its data card (5-586). Fifteen of them were found.
From the remaining entries, one with the highest
d (Å) value (4.27Å) was the first one.
This I used to skim through the leading values in the first four given pages
of the Hannawalt manual,
allowing that the last decimal might not be the same as it is in the powder
diffraction pattern. It resulted in the closest entry with card number 5-490,
alpha-SiO2. This proved to be right.
Then I again did removal of entries from the list which belonged to the already known
phases (a couple of them proved to be from both of them). From the remaining five
entries, the one with d = 2.742Å was the most
prominent one. Using it with 30-33 pages of the Hannawalt manual, I found
that the card nearest to the remaining values would be 8-479, i.e.
MgCO3.
Comment: in the last step (not in the first one, though) there was
a possibility that the biggest d
available value was not the biggest value of the unknown phase too, since that one could
have already been covered (and excluded from the list used for the quest) by a value from
already revealed two phases. But, this should not be a problem, since all entries in
the Hannawalt manual are given several times, differently ordered.
All the given entries are covered with this solution, so that can be inferred
that no additional phases (containing Ca, Si, and/or Mg)
are present in the sample (under the assumption that
there are no further phases which reflections are totally covered with those from
phases above).
Comment: Correct solutions and
correct search-logic used though a little more explanation of
the latter would have helped. The initial marking of calcite
entries was indeed the correct starting point; here the
anomalous FWHMs and intensities might be noted:
2 Marks
Comment: The solution of alpha-SiO2
was correct though what is "right" should be explained; for
example that all but the weakest alpha-SiO2 lines could be
observed (see model answer).
5.5 Marks
Comment: Similar comments re the
MgCO3 solution.
5.5 Marks
Comment: Final part again correct
though the other points (e.g. the microprobe information being
in agreement - see model answer) could be pointed out here.
2 Marks
Overall Comment: Correct solutions
and good methodology used in the searching, though a little
more explanation of your methods would help. I hope this
assignment was useful in giving you some further grasp of
the procedures involved in search/match analysis.
Total Mark 15