Answers to Problem Set 4 by Stewart F. Parker
Question: A collection of ancient plaster figures has been uncovered. A small sample is taken: microscopic examination identifies calcite (CaCO3) and electron microprobe analysis reveals Ca, Si and Mg as the major heavier elements. A powder diffraction pattern is collected, which after initial data analysis, yields the parameters below (the third parameter "FWHM" is a measure of the peak width).
Identify the two remaining phases in the sample. Explain, step by step, how you arrived at this solution. Comment on the solution.
| d (Å) | I (%) | FWHM(°) | d (Å) | I (%) | FWHM(°) | d (Å) | I (%) | FWHM(°) | ||||
| 4.27 | 28 | 0.27 | 2.237 | 4 | 0.23 | 1.700 | 5 | 0.35 | ||||
| 3.86 | 12 | 0.30 | 2.128 | 8 | 0.23 | 1.672 | 6 | 0.23 | ||||
| 3.343 | 82 | 0.25 | 2.102 | 6 | 0.35 | 1.659 | 2 | 0.24 | ||||
| 3.035 | 100 | 0.28 | 2.095 | 18 | 0.27 | 1.626 | 4 | 0.29 | ||||
| 2.845 | 3 | 0.28 | 1.980 | 4 | 0.23 | 1.604 | 8 | 0.28 | ||||
| 2.742 | 12 | 0.35 | 1.939 | 2 | 0.37 | 1.587 | 2 | 0.29 | ||||
| 2.503 | 2 | 0.36 | 1.927 | 5 | 0.29 | 1.541 | 12 | 0.23 | ||||
| 2.495 | 15 | 0.28 | 1.913 | 17 | 0.28 | 1.525 | 5 | 0.28 | ||||
| 2.458 | 10 | 0.22 | 1.875 | 17 | 0.28 | 1.518 | 4 | 0.30 | ||||
| 2.284 | 29 | 0.43 | 1.817 | 15 | 0.22 | 1.510 | 4 | 0.42 |
Even if you do not have the ICCD-PDF you will be able to work through the problem by using the files below (selected from the ICDD-PDF). You are advised to work through the problem in the following sequence:
The PDF entry for calcite (5-586) gives the following lines (and their intensities)
in the range 4.5 - 1.5 Å:
d( Å ) 3.860 3.035 2.845
2.495 2.285 2.095 1.927
1.913 1.875 1.626 1.604
1.587 1.525 1.518 1.510 Intensity 12 100 3
14 18 18 5
17 2 4 8
2 5 4 3
Comparison with the table above shows that the "literature intensity" accounts for all of
the observed intensity in these reflections except for the two at 2.284 Å (predicted 18, observed 29)
and 1.510 Å (predicted 3, observed 4).
The FWHM of these peaks is at least 50% greater than the majority of the other peaks, this strongly suggests
that one or more of the other phases also contribute to these peaks.
| Page: | 13 (77 kBytes) |
| 14 (78 kBytes) | |
| 15 (79 kBytes) | |
| 16 (86 kBytes) |
The largest unassigned peak is at 3.343 Å, so this must belong to one or more of the additional
phases. The electron microprobe data gives Ca, Si and Mg as the heavier elements. Typically, the microprobe can detect elements heavier than
about sodium, so it is a reasonable first assumption that the other elements present (if any) must belong to the first row of the Periodic
Table. I will assume that the Ca is all accounted for by the calcite, (if I am unable to assign another phase, I will relax this constraint).
Looking through page 14 of the Hanawalt search manual in the d-spacing range 3.39 - 3.32  Å, there are a number of possible hits but
the only one that contains only Si or Mg plus light elements is silica, SiO2. This is also chemically reasonable as a filler in plaster.
The PDF number is 5-490 and the card was successfully retreived suggesting that it is a correct assignment!
The PDF entry for silica gives the following lines (and their intensities)
in the range 4.5 - 1.5 Å:
d( Å ) 3.343 2.458
2.282 2.237 2.128 1.980
1.817 1.801 1.672 1.659
1.608 1.541 Int. (Lit.) 100 12
12 6 9 6
17 <1 7 3
<1 15 Int. (Obs.) 100 12
13 5 10 5
18 0 7 2
0 15
The last two lines compare the PDF literature intensity with the observed ones, using the intensity of the
3.343 Å as 100%. The agreement is not perfect, but the overall pattern of intensities is well reproduced,
giving confidence in the assignment. The apparently anomalous observed intensity of the 2.284 Å reflection
is explained as overlap between reflections due to calcite and silica. This also explains the small shift for the silica line
(predicted 2.282, observed 2.284 Å).
| Page: | 30 (81 kBytes) |
| 31 (32 kBytes) | |
| 32 (29 kBytes) | |
| 33 (81 kBytes) |
The largest unassigned peak is at 2.742 Å, so this must belong to one or more of the additional
phases. The electron microprobe data gives Ca, Si and Mg as the heavier elements, as Ca and Si have been accounted for, I will assume that the material
must contain only Mg plus first row elements. Looking through page 32 of the Hanawalt search manual in the d-spacing range 2.74 - 2.70  Å, there are a number of possible hits but
the only one that contains only Mg plus light elements is magnesium carbonate, MgCO3.
The PDF number is 8-479 and the card was successfully retreived again suggesting that it is a correct assignment!
The PDF entry for magnesium carbonate gives the following lines (and their intensities)
in the range 4.5 - 1.5 Å:
d( Å ) 2.742 2.503
2.318 2.102 1.939 1.769
1.700 1.510 Int. (Lit.) 100 18
4 45 12 4
35 4 Int. (Obs.) 100 17
0 50 17 0
42 8
The last two lines compare the PDF literature intensity with the observed ones, using the intensity of the
2.742 Å as 100%. The agreement is reasonable with the overall pattern of intensities reproduced. As these reflections
are much weaker than those due to calcite and silica, the uncertainty in the intensity measurement will be aggravated when
scaled to 100%. The apparently anomalous observed intensity of the 1.510 Å reflection
is explained as overlap between reflections due to calcite and magnesium carbonate.
At this stage there are no unassigned lines or lines with anomalous intensities or widths, so the analysis can be considered complete.