![]() |
Examination Script & Marks
Sian Carol Davies |
| Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9 | Page 10 |
| Page 11 | Page 12 | Page 13 | Page 14 | Page 15 | Page 16 | Page 17 | Page 18 |
Final Marks with Comments
| Question | Mark | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6/10 | Wrong answer to (ii) |
| 2 | 5/10 | Parts of answer not relevant or correct |
| 3 | 0/10 | (Not attempted) |
| 4 | 7/10 | No mention of c |
| 5 | 8/10 | Although 120° not explicitly mentioned, answer OK in (i); wrong condition in (iii) |
| 6 | 10/10 | Gave different, but correct, explanation to that expected |
| 7 | 9/10 | No mention of 2-fold axis |
| 8 | 7/10 | Wrong value for cell D, but method OK in (i); bit brief for (ii) |
| 9 | 9/10 | Very good, but no mention of two oxide phases in (i) |
| 10 | 5/10 | OK, but bit brief for part (i) and error in (ii) |
| 11 | 2/10 | Correct answer deleted in (i)!; wrong method in (ii) |
| 12 | 5/10 | Numerical error in (i) and wrong choice of hkl; correct idea in (ii), but wrong way round! |
| 13 | 4/10 | Parts (iii) and (iv) not attempted |
| 14 | 0/10 | (Not attempted) |
| 15 | 7/10 | Too brief for part (i) |
| © Copyright 1997-2000. Birkbeck College, University of London. |