Christy De Meyer
The information obtained from the microscopic examination, the identification of calcite (= CaCO3), enables us to assign certain reflections in this X-ray diffractogram to this compound.
| diffractogram of the ancient plaster |
ICCD-PDF entry for calcite | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d (Å) | I (%) | d (Å) | I (%) | remarks |
| 4.27 | 28 | from another phase | ||
| 3.86 | 12 | 3.86 | 12 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 3.343 | 82 | from another phase | ||
| 3.035 | 100 | 3.035 | 100 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 2.845 | 3 | 2.845 | 3 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 2.742 | 12 | from another phase | ||
| 2.503 | 2 | from another phase | ||
| 2.495 | 15 | 2.495 | 14 | I (14~15) and d the same + small FWHM peak form calcite + perhaps another small peak(?) |
| 2.458 | 10 | from another phase | ||
| 2.284 | 29 | 2.285 | 15 | d slightly different + I different + broad peak peak form calcite + peak from another compound |
| 2.237 | 4 | from another phase | ||
| 2.128 | 8 | from another phase | ||
| 2.102 | 6 | from another phase | ||
| 2.095 | 18 | 2.095 | 18 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.980 | 4 | from another phase | ||
| 1.939 | 2 | from another phase | ||
| 1.927 | 5 | 1.927 | 5 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.913 | 17 | 1.913 | 17 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.875 | 17 | 1.875 | 17 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.817 | 15 | from another phase | ||
| 1.700 | 5 | from another phase | ||
| 1.672 | 6 | from another phase | ||
| 1.659 | 2 | from another phase | ||
| 1.626 | 4 | 1.626 | 4 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.604 | 8 | 1.604 | 8 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.587 | 2 | 1.587 | 2 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.541 | 12 | from another phase | ||
| 1.525 | 5 | 1.525 | 5 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.518 | 4 | 1.518 | 4 | I and d identical + small FWHM peak form calcite |
| 1.510 | 4 | 1.510 | 3 | I (4~3) and d the same + broader FWHM peak form calcite + perhaps another small peak(?) |
Comment: You have got the right idea, and you
have correctly noted the need to flag up the 2.284 and 1.510 lines. I take
it you mean "peak from" rather than "peak form".
5 Marks
A number of peaks have already been identified as coming from
CaCO3. If we look at the remaining unidentified peaks, one can
easily notice a very sharp and intense peak at d=3.343Å. Looking in the
Hanawalt search manual, more specific on pages 14 and 15 (in the 3.39 - 3.32
+/-0.02 range) and keeping in mind the information from electron microprobe
analysis (Ca, Si ans Mg as major heavier elements), we can quickly find the
compound SiO2. How did I found this result?
Firstly, I searched
the Hanawalt manual for compounds with the most intense peak at 3.34Å.
Secondly, I checked the chemical composition (especially keeping an eye on
the compounds which contain Mg, Ca and Si).
Further examination included
the comparison of the other d-values (and their order of intensity).
This
yields SiO2 (5-490) as second phase. I searched the ICCD-PDF entry
for SiO2. As I did for CaCO3, I also indicated peaks of
SiO2 in the pattern of the ancient plaster. (In bold)
| diffractogram of the ancient plaster |
ICCD-PDF entry for calcite and SiO2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d (Å) | I (%) | d (Å) | I (%) | remarks |
| 4.27 | 28 | 4.26 | 35, but 29 relative to 82 |
I and d nearly the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 |
| 3.86 | 12 | 3.86 | 12 | peak form calcite |
| 3.343 | 82 | 3.343 | 100, but here 82 | d the same (I reference) + small FWHM peak form SiO2 |
| 3.035 | 100 | 3.035 | 100 | peak form calcite |
| 2.845 | 3 | 2.845 | 3 | peak form calcite |
| 2.742 | 12 | from another phase | ||
| 2.503 | 2 | from another phase | ||
| 2.495 | 15 | 2.495 | 14 | peak form calcite |
| 2.458 | 10 | 2.458 | 12, but 10 relative to 82 |
I and d the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 |
| 2.284 | 29 | 2.285 2.282 |
15 12, but 10 relative to 82 |
broad peak peak form calcite + SiO2 |
| 2.237 | 4 | 2.237 | 6, but 5 relative to 82 |
I and d nearly the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 |
| 2.128 | 8 | 2.128 | 9, but 7 relative to 82 |
I and d nearly the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 |
| 2.102 | 6 | from another phase | ||
| 2.095 | 18 | 2.095 | 18 | peak form calcite |
| 1.980 | 4 | 1.980 | 6, but 5 relative to 82 |
I and d nearly the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 |
| 1.939 | 2 | from another phase | ||
| 1.927 | 5 | 1.927 | 5 | peak form calcite |
| 1.913 | 17 | 1.913 | 17 | peak form calcite |
| 1.875 | 17 | 1.875 | 17 | peak form calcite |
| 1.817 | 15 | 1.817 | 17, but 14 relative to 82 |
I and d nearly the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 There should be a very small reflection at 1.801Å but probably this one is lost in the background |
| 1.700 | 5 | from another phase | ||
| 1.672 | 6 | 1.672 | 7, but 6 relative to 82 |
I and d nearly the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 |
| 1.659 | 2 | 1.659 | 3, but 2 relative to 82 |
I and d nearly the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 |
| 1.626 | 4 | 1.626 | 4 | peak form calcite |
| 1.604 | 8 | 1.604 | 8 | peak form calcite |
| 1.587 | 2 | 1.587 | 2 | peak form calcite |
| 1.541 | 12 | 1.541 | 15, but 12 relative to 82 |
I and d nearly the same + small FWHM peak form SiO2 There should be a very small reflection at 1.601Å but probably this one is lost in the background |
| 1.525 | 5 | 1.525 | 5 | peak form calcite |
| 1.518 | 4 | 1.518 | 4 | peak form calcite |
| 1.510 | 4 | 1.510 | 3 | peak form calcite |
There are still some gaps left in the spectrum. The highest peak left in this spectrum lies at an d=2.742Å. Thus, the third phase will not be found on pages 13-16.
Comment: This is the correct solution. Your
explanation of how to get the solution is clear, noting the elemental
and intensity information to be used. Also note that the agreement should
be in both positive and negative senses; i.e. you must also explain that
there are no lines missing in the sample that are present in the data file
- in fact there are 2 missing (see model answer) but this can be explained
on account of their weak intensities.
8 Marks
As the highest intensity of the third phase in the diffractogram is
resulting from d=2.742Å, I checked pages 30-32 (2.79-2.75 +/-0.1 and 2.74-2.70
+/-0.1). One remark: all of the remaining peaks are broader (FWHM of +/-
0.35).
Firstly, I searched the Hanawalt manual for compounds with the most
intense peak at 2.74Å.
Secondly, I checked the chemical composition (the
compound must contain Mg).
Further examination included the comparison of
the other d-values (and their order of intensity).
This yields
MgCO3 ( 8-479) as third phase. Searching the ICCD-PDF entry and
checking this composition on the pattern of the ancient plaster: (In Italic)
| diffractogram of the ancient plaster |
ICCD-PDF entry for calcite and SiO2 and MgCO2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d (Å) | I (%) | d (Å) | I (%) | remarks |
| 4.27 | 28 | 4.26 | 35, but 29 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 3.86 | 12 | 3.86 | 12 | peak form calcite |
| 3.343 | 82 | 3.343 | 100, but here 82 | peak form SiO2 |
| 3.035 | 100 | 3.035 | 100 | peak form calcite |
| 2.845 | 3 | 2.845 | 3 | peak form calcite |
| 2.742 | 12 | 2.742 | 100, but here 12 | d the same (I reference) peak form MgCO3 |
| 2.503 | 2 | 2.503 | 18, but 2 relative to 12 |
I and d nearly the same peak form MgCO3 |
| 2.495 | 15 | 2.495 | 14 | peak form calcite |
| 2.458 | 10 | 2.458 | 12, but 10 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 2.284 | 29 | 2.285 2.282 |
15 12, but 10 relative to 82 |
broad peak peak form calcite + SiO2 |
| 2.237 | 4 | 2.237 | 6, but 5 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 2.128 | 8 | 2.128 | 9, but 7 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 2.102 | 6 | 2.102 | 45, but 5 relative to 12 |
I and d nearly the same peak form MgCO3 There should be a very small reflection at 2.318Å but this one is certainly lost in the background |
| 2.095 | 18 | 2.095 | 18 | peak form calcite |
| 1.980 | 4 | 1.980 | 6, but 5 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 1.939 | 2 | 1.939 | 12, but 1 relative to 12 |
I and d nearly the same peak form MgCO3 |
| 1.927 | 5 | 1.927 | 5 | peak form calcite |
| 1.913 | 17 | 1.913 | 17 | peak form calcite |
| 1.875 | 17 | 1.875 | 17 | peak form calcite |
| 1.817 | 15 | 1.817 | 17, but 14 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 1.700 | 5 | 1.700 | 35, but 4 relative to 12 |
I and d nearly the same peak form MgCO3 There should be a very small reflection at 1.769Å but this one is certainly lost in the background |
| 1.672 | 6 | 1.672 | 7, but 6 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 1.659 | 2 | 1.659 | 3, but 2 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 1.626 | 4 | 1.626 | 4 | peak form calcite |
| 1.604 | 8 | 1.604 | 8 | peak form calcite |
| 1.587 | 2 | 1.587 | 2 | peak form calcite |
| 1.541 | 12 | 1.541 | 15, but 12 relative to 82 |
peak form SiO2 |
| 1.525 | 5 | 1.525 | 5 | peak form calcite |
| 1.518 | 4 | 1.518 | 4 | peak form calcite |
| 1.510 | 4 | 1.510 | 3 | peak form calcite there is a negletable signal from MgCO3 |
Comment: Again correct solution with a clear
explanation at how you arrived there; well spotted regarding the consistent
FWHM of the remaining phases. Again note that one missing line in the sample
needs to be excused (see model answer).
8 Marks
Additional Comment: Some additional comments
should be made concerning (very) rough ideas of relative amounts of phases and
their feasibility against the history of the find (see model answer).
0 Marks
Overall: A correct solution and clear explanation.
Beautiful & outstanding tables.