Page   1	Page   2	Page   3	Page   4	Page   5	Page   6	Page   7	Page   8	Page   9	Page 10
Page 11	Page 12	Page 13	Page 14	Page 15	Page 16	Page 17	Page 18	Page 19	Page 20
Page 21

Final Marks with Comments

Question	Mark	Comment
1	10/10	Excellent
2	7/10	(ii) Different figure to that expected, but correct answer given in additional text; (iii) Partially correct, but -ve b value is not linked to absorption; (v) Not attempted
3	10/10	Excellent, though main point missed in (iii)
4	10/10	Excellent
5	6/10	(ii) b) & c) Wrong choice of cell
6	10/10	Excellent
7	7/10	(iii) Wrong
8	9/10	Excellent, but not explicit enough in part (i)
9	8/10	Couple of minor errors
10	10/10	Excellent
11	8/10	(ii) Gaussian has quite steep sides, as for peak C
12	8/10	(v) Not attempted
13	10/10	Excellent
14	4/10	(ii) Bit vague and didn't refer to given CIF data; (iii) Wrong
15	8/10	(v) True comments, but quality control in itself is not really a defence of IPR